PERCEPTİON OF DRUG ABUSE İN SOCİETY: A SCALE DEVELOPMENT STUDY

PERCEPTİON OF DRUG ABUSE İN SOCİETY: A SCALE DEVELOPMENT STUDY

Authors

  • Hakkı Polat Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi
  • Bayram Kök Eskişehir Uyuşturucu ile Mücadele Derneği

Keywords:

Drug abuse, social conditions, social behavior disorder

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to develop a scale upon perception of drug abuse in society.
Method: The study sample consisted of a total of 1531 person aged over 18 years old. For this sampling, a few district were selected randomly in Eskişehir. There have been obtained data for demographic properties and perception of drug abuse by the surveys which applied to persons. Existing perception of drug abuse in society has been researched by the analyzing the collected data.
Results: There is four important factor up to begin drugs and continue to drug abuse: personal conditions by family attitude, society and friends, society susceptibility and the struggle of institutions and organizations. The reliability of these 4 factors was 84,8%, the variance explanation rate was 52% and the goodness of fit values were higher than 90%.
Conclusion: People think that family, friendship, society and institutions are effect up to starting drugs abuse. However, they are refraining from expressing a role to themselves in the struggle against this problem too. People are considered to be responsible for this subject, but people also think that they exclude the drug addicts and their family.

References

Shaffer HJ, LaPlante DA, Nelson SE (editors). APA Addiction Syndrome Handbook. 1.Baskı, Washington: American Psychological Association Press, 2012.

White WL. Addiction recovery: Its definition and conceptual boundaries. J Subst Abuse Treat 2007; 33(3): 229-41.

Compton P, Darakjian J, Miotto K. Screening for addiction in patients with chronic pain and “problematic” substance use: evaluation of a pilot assessment tool. J Pain Symptom Manage 1998; 16(6): 355-363.

Nestler EJ. Cellular basis of memory for addiction. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 2013; 15: 431-443.

Taylor SB, Lewis CR, Olive MF. The neurocircuitry of illicit psychostimulant addiction: acute and chronic effects in humans. Subst Abuse Rehabil 2013; 4: 29-43

Benton D. The plausibility of sugar addiction and its role in obesity and eating disorders. Clinical Nutrition 2010; 29(3): 288-303.

Dackis C, O'Brien C. Neurobiology of addiction: treatment and public policy ramifications. Nat Neurosci 2005; 8(11): 1431.

Di Chiara G. Drug addiction as dopamine-dependent associative learning disorder. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1999; 375(1-3): 13-30.

Ersche KD, Jones PS, Williams GB, Turton AJ, Robbins TW, Bullmore ET. Abnormal brain structure implicated in stimulant drug addiction. Science 2012; 335(6068): 601-604.

Hall W, Carter A, Forlini C. The brain disease model of addiction: is it supported by the evidence and has it delivered on its promises? Lancet Psychiatry 2015; 2(1): 105-10.

Koob GF, Buck CL, Cohen A, Edwards S, Park PE, Schlosburg JE, et al. Addiction as a stress surfeit disorder. Neuropharmacology 2014; 76: 370-382.

Kuhn J, Bauer R, Pohl S, Lenartz D, Huff W, Kim EH, et al. Observations on unaided smoking cessation after deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens. Eur Addict Res 2009; 15: 196-201.

Leshner AI. Addiction is a brain disease, and it matters. Science 1997; 278(5335): 45-47.

Luigjes Jv, Van Den Brink W, Feenstra Mv, Van den Munckhof P, Schuurman P, Schippers R, et al. Deep brain stimulation in addiction: a review of potential brain targets. Mol Psychiatry 2012; 17:572.

N Gearhardt A, A White M, N Potenza M. Binge eating disorder and food addiction. Curr Drug Res Rev 2011; 4: 201-207.

Pelloux Y, Baunez C. Deep brain stimulation for addiction: why the subthalamic nucleus should be favored. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2013; 23: 713-720.

Ruffle JK. Molecular neurobiology of addiction: what’s all the (Δ) FosB about? Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 2014; 40: 428-437.

Valencia-Alfonso C-E, Luigjes J, Smolders R, Cohen MX, Levar N, Mazaheri A, et al. Effective deep brain stimulation in heroin addiction: a case report with complementary intracranial electroencephalogram. Biol Psychiatry 2012; 71: 35-37.

Young KS. Internet addiction: The emergence of a new clinical disorder. Cyberpsychol Behav 1998; 1: 237-244.

Yuan K, Qin W, Wang G, Zeng F, Zhao L, Yang X, et al. Microstructure abnormalities in adolescents with internet addiction disorder. PloS One 2011; 6(6): 1-8.

Chandler RK, Fletcher BW, Volkow ND. Treating drug abuse and addiction in the criminal justice system: improving public health and safety. JAMA Psychiatry 2009; 301: 183-190.

Barrett AE, Turner RJ. Family structure and substance use problems in adolescence and early adulthood: examining explanations for the relationship. Addiction 2006; 101: 109-120.

Copello AG, Velleman RD, Templeton LJ. Family interventions in the treatment of alcohol and drug problems. Drug and alcohol review. 2005;24:369-385.

Hirsch R, Imhof JE. A family therapy approach to the treatment of drug addiction. J Psychoactive Drugs 1975; 7: 181-185.

Lewis RA, Piercy FP, Sprenkle DH, Trepper TS. Family-based interventions for helping drug-abusing adolescents. J Adolesc Res 1990; 5: 82-95.

Liddle HA, Dakof GA, Turner RM, Henderson CE, Greenbaum PE. Treating adolescent drug abuse: A randomized trial comparing multidimensional family therapy and cognitive behavior therapy. Addiction. 2008; 103: 1660-1670.

Rowe CL. Family therapy for drug abuse: Review and updates 2003–2010. J Marital Fam Ther 2012; 38: 59-81.

Schafer G. Family functioning in families with alcohol and other drug addiction. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand 2011; 37: 135-151.

Szapocznik J, Hervis O, Schwartz S. Therapy Manuals for Drug Addiction: brief strategic family therapy for adolescnet drug abuse. 5.Baskı, Maryland, US Department of Health and Human Services Press, 2003: 42-55

Kotrlik J, Higgins C. Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research appropriate sample size in survey research. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal 2001; 19(1): 43.

Kaiser HF. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika 1974; 39: 31-36.

Bartlett MS. Tests of significance in factor analysis. Br J Math Stat Psychol 1950; 3: 77-85.

Bentler PM, Bonett DG. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol Bull 1980; 88: 588-606.

Marsh HW, Balla JR, McDonald RP. Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychol Bull 1988; 103: 391-410.

Cami J, Farré M. Drug addiction. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 975-986.

de Rios MD, Smith DE. Drug use and abuse in cross cultural perspective. Hum Organ. 1977; 36: 1421.

Davies JB. Myth of Addiction. London: Routledge Press, 2013.

Goode E. Drugs in American Society: 7.Baskı, Newyork: McGraw-Hill Press, 2007.

Hanson G, Venturelli P, Fleckenstein A. Drugs and society: 11.Baskı, Utah: Jones & Bartlett Press, 2012.

Orford J, Copello A, Velleman R, Templeton L. Family members affected by a close relative's addiction: The stress-strain-coping-support model. Drugs 2010;17: 36-43.

Cohen FS, Densen-Gerber J. A study of the relationship between child abuse and drug addiction in 178 patients: Preliminary results. Child Abuse Negl 1982; 6: 383-387.

Stanton MD, Todd TC. The Family Therapy of Drug Abuse and Addiction. New York, Guilford Press; 1982.

Brown BS, Flynn PM. The federal role in drug abuse technology transfer: A history and perspective. J Subst Abuse Treat 2002; 22: 245-257.

Gregoire TK. Assessing the benefits and increasing the utility of addiction training for public child welfare workers: A pilot study. Child Welfare. 1994; 73: 69-81.

Worrall JL. Addicted to the drug war: The role of civil asset forfeiture as a budgetary necessity in contemporary law enforcement. J Crim Justice 2001;29:171-187.

Ringold DJ. Boomerang effects in response to public health interventions: Some unintended consequences in the alcoholic beverage market. J Consum Policy 2002; 25: 27-63.

Benowitz NL. Nicotine Safety and Toxicity. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.

Barry CL, McGinty EE, Pescosolido BA, Goldman HH. Stigma, discrimination, treatment effectiveness, and policy: public views about drug addiction and mental illness. Psychiatr Serv 2014; 65: 1269-1272.

Published

2019-09-01

How to Cite

1.
Polat H, Kök B. PERCEPTİON OF DRUG ABUSE İN SOCİETY: A SCALE DEVELOPMENT STUDY. J Depend [Internet]. 2019 Sep. 1 [cited 2025 Aug. 20];20(3):119-32. Available from: https://bagimlilik.akademisyen.net/index.php/bagimlilik/article/view/327

Issue

Section

Research Article
Loading...