RİSK-TAKİNG BEHAVİOR AND INTERNET ADDİCTİON FROM GENDER PERSPECTİVE
Keywords:
Risk-taking behavior, addiction, attitude to computers, health risk behaviorsAbstract
Objective: This research aims to examine risk-taking behaviors and internet usage within the context of gender, to reveal possible connections between internet addiction and risk-taking behaviors in certain areas of daily life.
Method: 539 participants, 260 (48.2%) female and 279 (51.8%) male, participated in the study. Participants were administered a sociodemographic form, a Domain-Specific Risk Attitude Scale (DOSPERT) to examine risk-taking behaviors and Internet Addiction Scale (IAS) to evaluate level of internet addiction.
Results: There was a statistically significant difference between mean rank scores of men's and women's risk-taking behaviors. It was observed that, men had high mean score in ethics in everyday life, gambling and security, and women had high mean score in social sub-dimension. There was no significant difference between the mean scores of IAS. A positive correlation was found between IAS and whole sub-domains of DOSPERT. In order to determine the effect of gender in this correlation, the dataset splitted by gender groups were analyzed and a significant correlation was found between the sum of women’s and men’s IAS and DOSPERT domain scores.
Conclusion: The average internet users has lower averages in all areas of risk taking behavior than internet addicts and individuals at risk of internet addiction.
References
Furby L, Beyth-Marom R. Risk taking in adolescence: A decision-making perspective. Dev Rev 1992; 12: 1–44.
American Psychological Association. APA Dictionary of Psychology (2nd ed.). 2. baskı. VandenBos GR, editör. Washington DC: American Psychological Association; 2015
Womack SD, Hook JN, Reyna SH, Ramos M. Sleep loss and risk-taking behavior: a review of the literature. Behav Sleep Med 2013; 11: 343–359.
Ben-Zur H, Zeidner M. Threat to life and risk-taking behaviors: A review of empirical findings and explanatory models. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2009; 13: 109-128.
Gullone E, Moore S. Adolescent risk-taking and the five-factor model of personality. J Adolesc 2000; 23: 393– 407.
Brizer D, Castaneda R. Clinical addiction psychiatry. Clin Addiction Psychiatry. 2010. 1–257 s.
Winston AP, Hardwick E, Jaberi N. Neuropsychiatric effects of caffeine. Adv Psychiatr Treat 2005; 11: 432– 439.
Leigh BC. Peril, chance, adventure: concepts of risk, alcohol use and risky behavior in young adults. Addiction 1999; 94: 371–383.
Buss DM. Evolutionary personality psychology. Annu Rev Psychol 1991; 42: 459–491.
Trimpop R. The Psychology of Risk Taking Behavior. Amsterdam: North Holland; 1994. 416 s.
Bechara A, Tranel D, Damasio H. Characterization of the decision-making deficit of patients with ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions. Brain 2000; 123: 2189–2202.
Singer T, Critchley HD, Preuschoff K. A common role of insula in feelings, empathy and uncertainty. Trends Cogn Sci 2009; 13: 334–340.
Kreek MJ, Nielsen DA, Butelman ER, LaForge KS. Genetic influences on impulsivity, risk taking, stress responsivity and vulnerability to drug abuse and addiction. Nat Neurosci 2005; 8: 1450-1457.
Eysenck HJ. The Biological Basis of Personality. New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA: Transaction Publishing; 2006.
Eysenck HJ. Biological dimensions of personality. Pervin LA, editor. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research. New York, NY, US: Transaction Publishing; 1950.
Eysenck HJ. Dimensions of Personality. New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA: Transaction Publishing; 1950: 308.
Buss A, Plomin R. Temperament: Early Developing Personality Traits. London: Psychology Press; 198: 196.
Trimpop R., Kerr J., Kirkcaldy B. Comparing personality constructs of risk-taking behavior. Pers Individ Dif 1998; 26: 237–254.
Whiteside SP, Lynam DR. The five factor model and impulsivity: Using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity. Pers Individ Dif 2001; 30: 669–689.
Zuckerman M, Kuhlman DM. Personality and risk-taking: Common biosocial factors. J Pers 2000; 68: 999– 1029.
Donovan JE. Adolescent alcohol initiation: A review of psychosocial risk factors. J Adolesc Health 2004; 35: 529.e7-529.e18.
Hermens DF, Scott EM, White D, et al. Frequent alcohol, nicotine or cannabis use is common in young persons presenting for mental healthcare: A cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2013; 3: e002229.
Charness G, Gneezy U. Strong evidence for gender differences in risk taking. J Econ Behav Organ 2012; 83: 50–58.
Eckel CC, Grossman PJ. Sex differences and statistical stereotyping in attitudes toward financial risk. Evol Hum Behav 2002; 23: 281–295.
Cobey KD, Stulp G, Laan F, et al. Sex differences in risk taking behavior among dutch cyclists. Evol Psychol 2013; 11: 350–364.
Eker İ, Yılmaz B. Risk alma davranışı: Çocukluk çağı travmaları ve benlik saygısı temelinde bir değerlendirme. Klinik Psikiyatri Dergisi 2016; 19: 27–36.
Mohammadpoorasl A, Ghahramanloo AA, Allahverdipour H. Risk-taking behaviors and subgrouping of college students: a latent class analysis. Am J Mens Health 2013; 7: 475–481.
Livingstone S, Helsper E. Balancing opportunities and risks in teenagers’ use of the internet: the role of online skills and internet self-efficacy. New Media Soc 2010; 12: 309–329.
Dowdell EB, Bradley PK. Risky internet behaviors: A case study of online and offline stalking. J Sch Nurs 2010; 26: 436–442.
Ko CH, Hsiao S, Liu GC, et al. The characteristics of decision making, potential to take risks, and personality of college students with Internet addiction. Psychiatry Res 2010; 175: 121–125.
Slater MD. Alienation, aggression, and sensation seeking as predictors of adolescent use of violent film, computer, and website content. J Commun 2003; 53: 105–121.
Özdemir Y, Kuzucu Y, Ak Ş. Depression, loneliness and internet addiction: How important is low self-control? Comput Human Behav 2014; 34: 284–290.
Finn PR. Motivation, working memory, and decision making: a cognitive-motivational theory of personality vulnerability to alcoholism. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev 2002; 1: 183–205.
Kelley AE, Schochet T, Landry CF. Risk taking and novelty seeking in adolescence: Introduction to part I. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2004; 1021: 27–32.
Lukasiewicz M, Neveu X, Blecha L, et al. Pathways to substance-related disorder: a structural model approach exploring the influence of temperament, character, and childhood adversity in a national cohort of prisoners. Alcohol Alcohol 2008; 43: 287–295.
Lejuez CW, Aklin WM, Bornovalova MA, Moolchan ET. Differences in risk-taking propensity across inner-city adolescent ever- and never-smokers. Nicotine Tob Res 2005; 7: 71–79.
Forbush KT, Shaw M, Graeber MA, et al. Neuropsychological characteristics and personality traits in pathological gambling. CNS Spectr 2008; 13: 306–315.
Ko CH, Yen JY, Chen CC, et al. Tridimensional personality of adolescents with internet addiction and substance use experience. Can J Psychiatry 2006; 51: 887–894.
Bornovalova MA, Daughters SB, Hernandez GD, et al. Differences in impulsivity and risk-taking propensity between primary users of crack cocaine and primary users of heroin in a residential substance-use program. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2005; 4: 311–318.
Guo L, Mei S, Ming Z. Research on sensation seeking, internet addiction disorder and related factors in college students. Educ Sci 2009; 3:13.
Lejoyeux M, McLoughlin M, Adès J. Epidemiology of behavioral dependence: Literature review and results of original studies. Eur Psychiatry 2000; 15: 129–134.
Lin SSJ, Tsai CC. Sensation seeking and internet dependence of Taiwanese high school adolescents. Comput Human Behav 2002; 18: 411–426.
Zuckerman M. Faites vos jeux anouveau: Still another look at sensation seeking and pathological gambling. Pers Individ Dif 2005; 39: 361–365.
Öner ET. Belirli Alanlara Özgü Risk Tutumları Ölçeğinin Türk üniversite öğrencilerine uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Yüksek lisans tezi, Ankara: Gazi Üniversitesi, 2009.
Blais AR, Weber EU. A domain-specific risk-taking (DOSPERT) scale for adult populations. Judgm Decis Mak 2006; 1: 33-47.
Balta ÖÇ, Horzum MB. İnternet Bağımlılığı Testi. Eğitim Bilimleri ve Uygulama 2008; 7(13): 87-102.
Weber EU, Blais AR, Betz NE. A domain-specific risk-attitude scale: measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. J Behav Decis Mak 2002; 15: 263–290.
Kozan K. Davranış bilimleri araştırmalarında sosyal beğenirlik boyutu ve Türkiye için bir Sosyal Beğenirlik Ölçeği. ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi 1983; 10: 447–478.
Young KS. Internet addiction: The emergence of a new clinical disorder. Cyberpsychology Behav 1998; 1: 237– 244.
Widyanto L, McMurran M. The psychometric properties of the internet addiction test. Cyberpsychology Behav 2004; 7: 443–450.
Byrnes JP, Miller DC, Schafer WD. Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 1999; 125: 367–383.
Croson R, Gneezy U. Gender differences in preferences. J Econ Lit 2009; 47: 448–474.
Finucane ML, Slovic P, Mertz CK, et al. Gender, race, and perceived risk: The “white male” effect. Health Risk Soc 2000; 2: 159–172.
Kelling GW, Zirkes R, Myerowitz D. Risk as value: A switch of set hypothesis. Psychol Rep 1976; 38: 655–658.
Fisk SR. Who’s on top? Gender differences in risk-taking produce unequal outcomes for high-ability women and men. Soc Psychol Q 2018; 81: 185–206.
Fisk SR. Gender stereotypes, risk-taking, and gendered mobility. Adv Group Process 2016; 33: 179–210.
Kumcağız H. Examination of turkish university students’ internet addiction in relation to their parental attachment styles and sociodemographics. SAGE Open 2019; 9: 215824401984594.
Aslan E, Yazıcı A. Üniversite öğrencilerinde internet bağımlığı ve ilişkili sosyodemografik faktörler. Klinik Psikiyatri Dergisi 2016; 19: 109–117.
Durak Batıgün A, Kılıç N. İnternet bağımlılığı ile kişilik özellikleri, sosyal destek, psikolojik belirtiler ve bazı sosyo-demografik değişkenler arasındaki ilişkiler. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi 2011; 26(67): 1–10.
Odacı H, Kalkan M. Problematic internet use, loneliness and dating anxiety among young adult university students. Comput Educ 2010; 55: 1091–1097.
Charlton JP, Danforth IDW. Distinguishing addiction and high engagement in the context of online game playing. Comput Human Behav 2007; 23: 1531–1548.
Potenza MN, Leung H-C, Blumberg HP, et al. An fMRI stroop task study of ventromedial prefrontal cortical function in pathological gamblers. Am J Psychiatry 2003; 160: 1990–1994.
Seok JW, Lee KH, Sohn S, Sohn JH. Neural substrates of risky decision making in individuals with Internet addiction. Aust New Zeal J Psychiatry 2015; 49 :923–932.
Morgenroth T, Fine C, Ryan MK, Genat AE. Sex, drugs, and reckless driving. Soc Psychol Personal Sci 2018; 9: 744–753.
Nelson JA. The power of stereotyping and confirmation bias to overwhelm accurate assessment: the case of economics, gender, and risk aversion. J Econ Methodol 2014; 21: 211–231.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Dependence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
...