ANALYSİS OF THE SUBSTANCE SCANNİNG TEST RESULTS OF NON- ALCOHOL SUBSTANCE ABUSERS WHO ADMİTTED AN UNİVERSİTY HOSPİTAL

ANALYSİS OF THE SUBSTANCE SCANNİNG TEST RESULTS OF NON- ALCOHOL SUBSTANCE ABUSERS WHO ADMİTTED AN UNİVERSİTY HOSPİTAL

Authors

  • Aslıhan Okan Dicle Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Psikiyatri Anabilim Dalı
  • Abdullah Atlı Dicle Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Psikiyatri Anabilim Dalı
  • Cafer Alhan Van Bölge Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Psikiyatri Bölümü
  • Süleyman Demir Dicle Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Psikiyatri Anabilim Dalı
  • Mehmet Cemal Kaya Dicle Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Psikiyatri Anabilim Dalı
  • Aytekin Sır Dicle Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Psikiyatri Anabilim Dalı

Keywords:

Diyarbakir, Marijuana, Substance Test

Abstract

Background: Urine toxicological analysis is one of the objective procedures as rapidly investigate for the identifies substance use, including initial diagnosis, with treatment plan for substance abusers and compliance with treatment. Toxicological analysis for legal purposes primarily aims to detect illegal or banned drug and substance use in a variety of situations.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of toxicological analysis of patients who admitted to Dicle University Hospital with prediagnosis of non-alcohol substance use.
Method: The participants of the study included 167 patients who admitted voluntarily or by request of the family to outpatient psychiatry department of Dicle Medicine Faculty and who were asked for urine toxicology screen from January to December 2014. The files of each participants were carefully evaluated with retrospective analysis by the experienced researchers.
Results: 12.0 % (n=20) of the participants were female, and 88.0 % (n=147) of them were male. 44.9 % of participants (n=75) had urine positive whereas the 55.1% of patients (n=92) had urine negative for substance use. The most common substance use was Marijuana (88%, n=66) followed by 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) (18.6%,n=14), Methamphetamine (Meth) (16.0%,n=12), opioids (5.3%, n=4), Barbiturates (4.0%,n=3) and Phencyclidine (PCP) (2.7%, n=2), respectively. Results showed that 37.3% (n=28) of patients were using polysubstance, whereas the 62.7% (n=47) of patients were using only one substance. One particular substance usage ratio was: 43 participants were using Marijuana, 2 participants were using Meth, 1 participant was using Barbiturates, and 1 participant was using MDMA.
Discussion and Conclusion: According to toxicological analysis, substance use were not found in 55.1 % of the participants. The most common substance use was marijuana in toxicological analysis. In addition, other substances with stimulant effect were among the commonly used substances, including the meth amphetamine, amphetamine and also phencyclidine, barbiturates, opioid and its derivatives. Numerous environmental factors may have affected this growing rates of increases in marijuana abuse and growing dependence prevalence. As a result, substance abuse is an important public health problem. Increase in substance use rate and easy access to substances have reached a worrying level. Our region carries a significant risk in terms of the substance abuse and particularly for marijuana. In light of these results, protective actions related to use of the substances should be increased besides the emergency health care needs in Diyarbakir.

References

Ögel K. İnsan, Yaşam ve Bağımlılık Tartışmalar ve Gerekçeler. İstanbul: IQ Kültür Sanat Yayıncılık, 2001.

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, World Drug Report, 2005. United Nations Publication Sales No. E.05.XI.10 ISBN 92-1148200-3 Volume 1. https://www.unodc.org/pdf/WDR_2005/volume_1_web.pdf

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime,World Drug Report, 2012. United Nations publication, ISBN: 978-92-1-148267-6 e-ISBN: 978-92-1055653-8 Sales No. E.12.XI.1. https://www. unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/ WDR2012/WDR_2012_web_small.pdf

Akvardarlar Y, Arıkan Z, Berkman K, Dilbaz N, Oral G, Uluğ B, Uzbay İT, Aknür Annette S, Bilici M, Tamar Gürol D, Mete L, Gürel ŞC, Zorlu N (editörler). Madde Bağımlılığı Tanı ve Tedavi Klavuzu El Kitabı. T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Sağlık Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara: Pozitif Matbaa, 2011.

Hser YI, Evans E, Teruya C, et al. Predictors of short-term treatment outcomes among California’s Proposition 36 participants. Evaluation and program planning 2007; 30: 187-96.

Göç İstatistikleri. http://www.tuik. gov.tr/VeriBilgi.do?alt_id=1067

Akgül A. Combating illegal cannabis cultivation and policies in Turkey. Uluslararası Güvenlik ve Terörizm Dergisi 2014; 5: 119-40.

Bilici R, Uğurlu GK, Tufan, E, ve ark. Bir bağımlılık merkezinde yatarak tedavi gören hastaların sosyodemografik özellikleri. Fırat Tıp Dergisi 2012; 17: 223-7.

Asan Ö, Tıkır B, Okay, İT, Göka, E. Sociodemographic and clinical features of patients with alcohol and substance use disorders in a specialized unit. Journal of Dependence 2015; 16: 1-8.

Şimşek Ş, Dönmezdil S, Kakdaş, E, Özen, Ş. Sociodemographic characteristics of patients admitted to Diyarbakir Research, Treatment and Training Centre for substance addiction in children and adolescents and types of substances used. Journal of Dependence 2014; 15: 23-27.

Bulut M, Savaş HA, Cansel, N, ve ark. Gaziantep Üniversitesi alkol ve madde kullanım bozuklukları birimine başvuran hastaların sosyodemografik özellikleri. Bağımlılık Dergisi 2006; 7: 65-70.

Kalaydjian A, Swendsen J, Chiu WT, et al. Sociodemographic predictors of transitions across stages of alcohol use, disorders, and remission in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Comprehensive psychiatry 2009; 50: 299-306.

Regier DA, Farmer ME, Rae DS, et al. Comorbidity of mental disorders with alcohol and other drug abuse. Results from the Epidemiologic Catchment Area (ECA) Study. Jama 1990; 264: 2511-8.

Sır A, Özkan M, Bayram Y, Kan A. Diyarbakır bölgesinde esrar ve eroin kullanıcılarının sosyo-demografik özellikleri. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi 1998; 9: 291-5.

Güleç C, Köroğlu E (editörler). Psikiyatri Temel Kitabı. Ankara: Hekimler Yayın Birliği, 1997.

Macfadden W, Woody GE. Cannabis-related disorders. Sadock BJ, Sadock VA (editors.). Kaplan and Sadock’s Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000: 990-999.

Palancı Y, Oto R. Diyarbakır Madde Bağımlılığı Risk Araştırması. 2015, Diyarbakır Büyükşehir Belediyesi Sosyal Hizmetler Daire Başkanlığı Projesi, Basımda.

Published

2016-06-01

How to Cite

1.
Okan A, Atlı A, Alhan C, Demir S, Kaya MC, Sır A. ANALYSİS OF THE SUBSTANCE SCANNİNG TEST RESULTS OF NON- ALCOHOL SUBSTANCE ABUSERS WHO ADMİTTED AN UNİVERSİTY HOSPİTAL. J Depend [Internet]. 2016 Jun. 1 [cited 2025 Aug. 20];17(2):66-70. Available from: https://bagimlilik.akademisyen.net/index.php/bagimlilik/article/view/266

Issue

Section

Research Article
Loading...