The Adolescents Having Substance Disorder Applying to Treatment Çenter Via Probation, Health Policy and Family: Similar? Different?

The Adolescents Having Substance Disorder Applying to Treatment Çenter Via Probation, Health Policy and Family: Similar? Different?

Authors

  • Zeki Yüncü EGEBAM (Ege Üniversitesi Çocuk Ergen Alkol ve Madde Bağımlılığı Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezi)
  • Ömer Başay Ege Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Psikiyatri Çocuk Psikiyatrisi AD
  • Ender Altıntoprak Ege Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Psikiyatri AD Bağımlılık Tedavi Birimi
  • Hakan Coşkunol Ege Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Psikiyatri AD.
  • Serap A. Akgür Ege Üniversitesi Bağımlılık, İlaç Araştırma ve Toksikoloji Enstitüsü
  • Cahide Aydın Ege Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Psikiyatri AD.

Keywords:

Probation, adolescent, drug use

Abstract

Objective: Sentencing the children, who are substance abusers, with heavy imprisonment will not be an effective way of protection. Taking on the children's substance abuse matters by the social security and help associations rather than the criminal courts will be a healthy attitude. Probation (P) and the health policy (HP) are among these practices. The similarities and the differences of the cases applying via P, HP and FS (family support) have been assessed in this study.
Methods: The file records of the cases applied to an addiction center towards the children and adolescents having substance disorder, between January 2005 and December 2007 have been reviewed. It has been determined that 326 cases have applied to the center in this period. It has been determined that 16 of these cases P (4.9 %) scope and 16 of them have been assessed within the HP (4.9 %) scope. The cases, who applied via family (n=16) have been appointed randomly. SPSS 13.0 program has been used for the statistical assessment.
Results: It has been found that the differences among the groups are statistically meaningful in terms of onset age and the early onset age belongs to the cases having FS (p<0.05). It has been determined that there is a statistically meaningful difference among the groups in terms of marihuana and inhalant abuse (p<0.05). It has been determined that 31.2 % of the cases applied through HP have been under treatment in other association before (p<0.05). It has also been determined that the differences among the cases statistically meaningful in terms of existence of street life, behaviors those may cause criminal problems and work life (p<0.05).
Conclusion: The health services should be structured by guarding the substance abuse in children. With P and HP practices it has been possible to reach a group, who denies the substance abuse, who has not been subject to any treatment or continued the treatment but inclined to the criminal behavior.

References

Hyman SE. Addiction A disease of learning and memory. Am J Psychiatry 2005; 162:14141422.

Rehm J, Room R, van den Brink W, Kraus L. Problematic drug use and drug use disorders in EU countries and Norway: an overview of the epidemiology. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2005; 15(4): 389397.

Belenko S. The impact of drug offenders on the criminal justice system. Drugs, crime, and the criminal justice system, Weigheit R (Ed): Cincinnati: Anderson Publishing Co, 1990: 27-78.

Chari K, Baker JR, Lattimore PK. A decision support system for partial drug testing: DSS-DT. Decision Support Systems 1998;. 23 (3): 241-257.

Larsson-Kronberg M, OJehagen A, Berglund M. Experiences of coercion during investigation and treatment. Int J Law Psychiatry 2005; 28(6): 613-621.

Hodgkin R, Newell P. UNİCEF. Çocuk Haklarına Dair Sözleşme Uygulama El Kitabı. Akipek Ş (Çeviri editörü)2. Baskı, Cenevre, UNİCEF 2003: 507.

UNİCEF BM Çocuk haklarına dair sözleşmesi, İlgili sözleşmeler, yasalar, tüzükler ve yönetmelikler 2. Baskı, Ankara: 2005:239242.

Mumola CJ. Substance abuse and treatment, state and federal prisoners, 1997. ( NCJ Special Rep. No. 172871), U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington, DC, 1999.

Hser Yl_, Evan E, Teruya C, Huang D, Anglin MD. Predictors of shortterm treatment outcomes among California's Proposition 36 participants. Evaluation and Program Planning 2007; (30) 187-196.

BıçakV,Mukayeseli,GerekçeliYenITürkCeza Kanunu Ek: Türk Ceza Kanunun Yürürlük Ve Uygulama Şekli Hakkında Kanun. 1. Baskı, İstanbul: Vadi Yayınları, 2004: 385.

http://.www.egebagımlilik.org adresinden 28.3.2008 de indirilmiştir.

Amerikan Psikiyatri Birliği. Mental Bozuklukların Tanısal ve Sayımsal El Kitabı, dördüncü baskı (DSM-IV) E Köroğlu E (Çeviri editörü) Hekimler Yayın Birliği, Ankara, 1995.

Sinha R, Easton C, Kemp K. Substance abuse treatment characteristics of probation-referred young adults in a community-based outpatient program. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 2003; 29(3): 585-597.

Sharp CW. introduction to inhalant abuse. National institue on Drug Abuse. Research Monograph Series 1992; 129:1-13.

Yüncü Z, Özbaran B, Altıntoprak E, Yıldız U, Aydın C, Coşkunol H. Sokak yaşantısı olan-olmayan madde kullanım bozukluğu olan ergenlerin klinik ve sosyodemografik özellikleri. Türkiye de Psikiyatri Dergisi 2007; 9 (1): 37-43.

Öğel K, Tamar D, Çakmak D. Madde kullanımı sorununda Türkiye'nin yerine bir bakış. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi 1998; 9(4): 301-307.

Yüncü Z, Aydın C; Coşkunol H, Altıntoprak E, Bayram.AT. Çocuk ve ergenlere yönelik bir bağımlılık merkezinin 2 yıllık poliklinik kayıtlarının değerlendirilmesi. Bağımlılık Dergisi 2006; 7(1) :31- 37.

Birleşmiş Milletler Uyuşturucu ve Suç Ofisi Türkiye Proje Ofisi. Türkiye Sağlık Hizmetleri; Eğitim ve Toplumsal Girişimde Madde Kullanımının Önlenmesi. Madde Kullanımı üzerine ulusal değerlendirme çalışması (altı büyük şehirde elde edilen sonuçlar). Türkiye, 2004.

Evren C, Ögel K, Tamar D, Çakmak D. Uçucu madde kullanıcılarının özellikleri. Bağımlılık Dergisi 2001; 2.2: 57-60.

Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı. 2000 Yılı Programı. Ankara, 1999

Deborah R. Simkin. Ergen Madde Kullanımı. Bennjamin J, Sadock BJ, Virginia A, Sadock VA (editors). Kaplan & Sadock Comprehensive Textbook of Psycchiatry. Aydın H, Bozkurt A (Çeviri editörleri) 8 Baskı, Ankara, Güneş Kitabevi: 2005: 3470-3490.

Soysal H. Adli psikiyatri el kitabı. 1. Baskı, İstanbul: Roman's yayınları, 2005: 108-109.

Altıntoprak AE, Akgür SA, Coşkunol H. Yasa dişi madde kullanimi nedeniyle denetimli serbestlik tedbiri uygulanan kişilerde tedavi uygulamalar! ve toksikolojik analiz. Türkiye' de Pskiyatri Dergisi 2008 (Baskıda)

Sinha R, Easton C, Renee-Aubin L, Caroil KM. Engaging young probation-referred marijuana-abusing individuals in treatment: a pilot trial. Am J Addict 2003; 12(4): 314323.

Published

2010-04-01

How to Cite

1.
Yüncü Z, Başay Ömer, Altıntoprak E, Coşkunol H, A. Akgür S, Aydın C. The Adolescents Having Substance Disorder Applying to Treatment Çenter Via Probation, Health Policy and Family: Similar? Different?. J Depend [Internet]. 2010 Apr. 1 [cited 2025 Aug. 20];10(1):35-43. Available from: https://bagimlilik.akademisyen.net/index.php/bagimlilik/article/view/189

Issue

Section

Research Article
Loading...